FRM Part I · FRM Exam Part I · Measuring Return, Volatility, and Correlation
An asset has a monthly log return of 2.00% in month 1 and a monthly log return of -3.00% in month 2. Which statement about the two-month simple return is correct?
Log returns add to -1.00% over two months, but the simple return is found by converting back: e^(-0.01) - 1, about -0.995%. The sum of log returns is itself a log return, not a simple return, and simple returns do not add over time.
- AIt equals e^(-0.01) - 1, approximately -0.995%Correct
- BIt equals -1.00% exactly, the sum of the log returns
- CIt equals the arithmetic sum of the simple returns of each month
- DIt equals ln(0.99), approximately -1.005%
Explanation
Two-month log return = 0.02 - 0.03 = -0.01. Converting to a simple return gives e^(-0.01) - 1 = -0.995%. Option B and D confuse the log return with the simple return. Simple returns do not add across time (option C).
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Measuring Return, Volatility, and Correlation shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Measuring Return, Volatility, and Correlation questions
- Returns on two assets have equal variances and a correlation of -1. Which weights produce a portfolio with zero variance?
- The implied volatilities of equity index options with the same maturity are 28% for a 90% strike, 22% for a 100% strike and 20% for a 110% s…
- During a market crisis, a risk manager observes that the correlation between two equity portfolios rises sharply compared with calm periods.…
- Two assets have returns X and Y. A risk manager observes the following ranks for five paired observations (rank of X, rank of Y): (1,2), (2,…
- Compared with a normal distribution having the same mean and variance, a negatively skewed return distribution implies which of the followin…
- Daily log returns of an equity index are assumed to be independent with mean 0.04% and standard deviation 1.10%. Using 25 trading days in th…