Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Case Study: Investor Protection and Compliance Risks in Investment Activities

An asset manager's compliance function reviews a portfolio manager who repeatedly allocates profitable block trades to a favored proprietary account after execution, and allocates unprofitable trades to client accounts. Which compliance risk does this behavior most directly represent?

This is unfair trade allocation, known as cherry-picking. Assigning winning trades to a favored account after execution and losing trades to clients breaches fiduciary duty and fair-treatment obligations, so it is a compliance and investor protection risk rather than a best execution or liquidity issue.

  1. AUnfair trade allocation (cherry-picking) that breaches duties to clientsCorrect
  2. BBest execution failure caused by high commissions
  3. CMarket timing of mutual fund shares
  4. DFailure to maintain adequate liquidity buffers

Explanation

Allocating trades after seeing performance, favoring one account at the expense of clients, is cherry-picking. It breaches fiduciary duty and fair-allocation requirements. Best execution concerns the quality of execution price and cost, not post-trade allocation.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Case Study: Investor Protection and Compliance Risks in Investment Activities shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Case Study: Investor Protection and Compliance Risks in Investment Activities questions