Skip to content

CFA Level I · CFA Level I Exam · Fiscal Policy

An economist argues that households will respond to a debt-financed tax cut by saving the extra income, because they expect higher taxes in the future to repay the debt. This argument is best described as:

This is Ricardian equivalence. Forward-looking households see that debt-financed tax cuts imply higher future taxes, so they save the windfall rather than spend it, which offsets the deficit and limits the stimulus the tax cut was intended to provide.

  1. ARicardian equivalenceCorrect
  2. Bthe liquidity trap
  3. Cthe multiplier effect

Explanation

Ricardian equivalence holds that rational consumers offset the government's deficit by saving more, anticipating future taxes. This weakens the stimulative effect of debt-financed tax cuts. The multiplier effect and liquidity trap do not describe this behavior.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Fiscal Policy shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Fiscal Policy questions