Skip to content

CS Professional · Arbitration, Mediation and Conciliation · Conciliation Proceedings and International Perspective of Conciliation

Anand Pharma and Zenith Labs conciliated a licensing dispute and failed. In a later arbitration about an entirely different supply contract between the same parties, Anand wishes to use an admission made by Zenith's director during the conciliation about delayed payments. Anand argues the bar in Section 81 applies only where the later proceedings concern the same dispute. What is the correct position?

Anand is wrong. Section 81 bars reliance on the other party's admissions made in conciliation in arbitral or judicial proceedings, whether or not those proceedings relate to the conciliated dispute. So the admission cannot be used in the arbitration about the different contract.

  1. AAnand is right, as the bar applies only to the same dispute
  2. BAnand is right, as admissions are barred only in judicial, not arbitral, proceedings
  3. CAnand is wrong, because the bar applies only if the conciliator is a witness
  4. DAnand is wrong, because Section 81 applies whether or not the proceedings relate to the dispute subject to conciliationCorrect

Explanation

Section 81 states that parties shall not rely on the listed material in arbitral or judicial proceedings, whether or not such proceedings relate to the dispute that is the subject of the conciliation. Admissions made by the other party in the course of conciliation fall under clause (b).

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Conciliation Proceedings and International Perspective of Conciliation shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Conciliation Proceedings and International Perspective of Conciliation questions