CS Professional · Arbitration, Mediation and Conciliation · Conciliation Proceedings and International Perspective of Conciliation
Anand Pharma and Zenith Labs conciliated a licensing dispute and failed. In a later arbitration about an entirely different supply contract between the same parties, Anand wishes to use an admission made by Zenith's director during the conciliation about delayed payments. Anand argues the bar in Section 81 applies only where the later proceedings concern the same dispute. What is the correct position?
Anand is wrong. Section 81 bars reliance on the other party's admissions made in conciliation in arbitral or judicial proceedings, whether or not those proceedings relate to the conciliated dispute. So the admission cannot be used in the arbitration about the different contract.
- AAnand is right, as the bar applies only to the same dispute
- BAnand is right, as admissions are barred only in judicial, not arbitral, proceedings
- CAnand is wrong, because the bar applies only if the conciliator is a witness
- DAnand is wrong, because Section 81 applies whether or not the proceedings relate to the dispute subject to conciliationCorrect
Explanation
Section 81 states that parties shall not rely on the listed material in arbitral or judicial proceedings, whether or not such proceedings relate to the dispute that is the subject of the conciliation. Admissions made by the other party in the course of conciliation fall under clause (b).
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Conciliation Proceedings and International Perspective of Conciliation shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Conciliation Proceedings and International Perspective of Conciliation questions
- Orchid Pharma Ltd sent Sundaram Logistics a written invitation to conciliate on 1 March, specifying no particular reply period. Sundaram sen…
- Verma Infra and Bose Constructions failed to settle in conciliation. Verma Infra later started arbitration on a different dispute under anot…
- Kiran Steels Ltd invited Bharat Alloys Ltd in writing to conciliate a supply dispute. Bharat accepted in writing on 5 May. On 8 May, Kiran, …
- Conciliator Mr. Bose proposed that Lotus Pharma pay Orion Labs Rs 40 lakh to settle a licence dispute. Orion Labs told him it was willing to…
- Gupta Steels invited Hindustan Alloys to conciliate and Hindustan accepted in writing. During the proceedings, Hindustan's manager suggested…
- Rahul Traders and Sundaram Agro are conciliating a dispute with a conciliator appointed by them. Without consulting the conciliator, Sundara…