Skip to content

CA Final · Advanced Auditing, Assurance and Professional Ethics · Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) & Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) Assurance

Anvay Foods Ltd, a listed company, reports in its BRSR that it has reduced water consumption intensity by 18%. CA Tara, performing a limited assurance engagement, finds the baseline year figure was restated downward by management during the year, with no disclosure of the restatement and no supporting basis. Without the restatement, the reduction would be about 4%. What is the most appropriate course of action?

Tara should treat the undisclosed, unsupported baseline restatement as a possible material misstatement, request evidence and proper disclosure, and modify her conclusion if management does not correct it. She cannot amend the report herself, and arithmetic accuracy does not satisfy suitable reporting criteria.

  1. AAccept the claim since the reported figure is arithmetically correct
  2. BTreat the undisclosed, unsupported restatement as a potentially material misstatement, request evidence and disclosure, and if unresolved modify her conclusionCorrect
  3. CRemove the claim herself from the report and issue an unmodified conclusion
  4. DReport the matter only to the company's marketing team

Explanation

The restated baseline drives a large change in the reported performance, so it is likely material and misleading. Tara should obtain evidence and ask for disclosure, and if management does not correct it she should modify her conclusion. She cannot alter management's report herself, and arithmetic correctness does not mean the criteria are met.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) & Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) Assurance shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) & Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) Assurance questions