CA Final · Indirect Tax Laws · Miscellaneous Provisions (GST)
Arjun Traders, a registered person in Pune, removed goods on which excise duty was paid on 1 February, which was within six months before the appointed day. On a date within six months after the appointed day, an unregistered retail customer returned the goods to Arjun's place of business, and the goods are identifiable to the satisfaction of the proper officer. What is the treatment under the transitional provisions of the CGST Act?
Arjun is eligible for refund of the duty paid under the existing law. The goods were removed within six months before the appointed day, were returned within six months after it by an unregistered person, and are identifiable. Deemed supply applies only when a registered person returns the goods.
- AArjun is eligible for refund of the duty paid under the existing lawCorrect
- BThe return is deemed to be a supply and attracts GST
- CArjun may take CENVAT credit of the duty in his electronic credit ledger
- DNo refund is allowed, because duty cannot be refunded after the appointed day
Explanation
Under section 142(1), where duty-paid goods removed not earlier than six months before the appointed day are returned within six months from the appointed day by a person other than a registered person, and the goods are identifiable, the registered person is eligible for refund of the duty paid. The deemed-supply rule applies only when a registered person returns the goods, so the second option is wrong here.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Miscellaneous Provisions (GST) shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Miscellaneous Provisions (GST) questions
- Meera Industries, registered under GST, returned duty-paid goods to Kapoor Engineering, a registered manufacturer, within six months from th…
- Bharat Auto Components Ltd supplied parts under a contract made before the appointed day. After the appointed day the price was revised down…
- Under a contract entered into before the appointed day, Delta Engineering supplied goods to Mehra Ltd. After the appointed day, on 10 July, …
- Nair Steel received a refund claim order under the existing law: a claim for CENVAT credit refund was filed before the appointed day and was…
- Under a contract signed before the appointed day, Kaveri Engineering Pvt Ltd supplied machine parts to Delta Works Ltd, both registered. Aft…
- Kapoor Textiles, a registered person, supplied fabric to Anand Garments under a contract entered into before the appointed day. After the ap…