ACCA Applied Knowledge · Financial Accounting · Provisions and contingencies
Brandt plc signed a non-cancellable contract to rent a warehouse for $90,000 a year for the next 3 years. It has now ceased using the warehouse and can sublet it for $50,000 a year for the 3 years. Ignoring discounting, what provision should be recognised for the onerous contract?
The provision is $120,000. The net unavoidable cost is annual rent of $90,000 less sublet income of $50,000, which is $40,000 a year, and over the three remaining years this totals $120,000 when discounting is ignored.
- A$40,000
- B$270,000
- C$120,000Correct
- D$150,000
Explanation
The unavoidable cost of the contract is the lower of the cost of fulfilling it and any compensation from failure to fulfil it. Here the net cost is the rent of $90,000 less sublet income of $50,000 = $40,000 a year, over 3 years = $120,000. Providing $270,000 ignores sublet income.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Provisions and contingencies shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Provisions and contingencies questions
- Which of the following is a contingent liability rather than a provision under IAS 37?
- Zeta Co is defending a lawsuit brought by a customer. Its lawyers advise that it is possible, but not probable, that Zeta will lose and have…
- At the reporting date, Kestrel Co is defending a legal claim. Its lawyers advise that it is possible, but not probable, that the company wil…
- On 15 December, the board of Rilo Co decided to close a factory and approved a detailed formal plan. Employees and customers were told on 20…
- Delta Co's year end is 31 March 20X6. On 15 May 20X6, before the financial statements were authorised, a court ruled that Delta must pay $60…
- At 31 December, Orion Co has guaranteed a bank loan of a subsidiary-independent third party. Which of the following situations would lead Or…