ACCA Applied Knowledge · Management Accounting · Absorption and marginal costing
Brindle Co absorbs production overheads on a machine hour basis. Budgeted overheads were $450,000 for 90,000 machine hours. Actual overheads were $468,000 and actual machine hours were 88,000. What was the over- or under-absorption of overheads?
Overheads were under-absorbed by $28,000. Absorbed overhead is 88,000 actual hours at the $5 budgeted rate, or $440,000, which is less than the actual overhead cost of $468,000 incurred.
- AUnder-absorbed by $28,000Correct
- BUnder-absorbed by $18,000
- COver-absorbed by $18,000
- DOver-absorbed by $28,000
Explanation
Rate = $450,000 / 90,000 = $5 per hour. Absorbed = 88,000 x $5 = $440,000. Actual overheads were $468,000, so under-absorbed by $28,000. $18,000 is the difference between actual and budgeted overheads only.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Absorption and marginal costing shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Absorption and marginal costing questions
- Pell Co had absorption costing profit of $48,000 and marginal costing profit of $54,000 for a period. Fixed production overhead is absorbed …
- Which of the following is an advantage of marginal costing compared with absorption costing?
- Kestrel Co sold 8,000 units at $25 each. Variable cost is $15 per unit and fixed costs are $50,000. What is the profit under marginal costin…
- Which of the following is a limitation of marginal costing?
- Which of the following is the most likely reason for under-absorbed fixed production overhead in a period?
- Which of the following is an advantage of absorption costing?