Skip to content

ACCA Applied Skills · Financial Reporting · Intangible assets

Brindle Co spent $240,000 on a staff training programme this year which it believes will improve productivity for several years. It also paid $90,000 for a licence to use a patented process for 5 years, which gives it legal rights that others cannot use. What total amount should Brindle recognise as an intangible asset?

Brindle should recognise $90,000. The patented process licence is identifiable and controlled through legal rights, so it is capitalised. The $240,000 training spend is expensed because the entity cannot control the future benefits from trained staff, so it fails the control criterion in IAS 38.

  1. A$330,000
  2. B$240,000
  3. C$90,000Correct
  4. D$0

Explanation

Training costs are not recognised as an intangible asset because the entity lacks sufficient control over future benefits from skilled staff, so they are expensed. The licence is identifiable and controlled through legal rights, so $90,000 is capitalised. Adding both gives $330,000, which wrongly capitalises the training.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Intangible assets shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Intangible assets questions