CA Intermediate · Auditing and Ethics · Completion and Review
CA Tanvi is auditing Narmada Infra Ltd, a listed company. In the final stage she identifies that the financial statements contain a material misstatement in the valuation of inventory of Rs 4 crore, which is 15% of profit before tax. Management refuses to correct it. The effect is material but not pervasive. She also notes that management has otherwise provided all information. Which of the following is the correct audit response in the report?
She should issue a qualified opinion with except-for wording and a Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph. The inventory misstatement is material but not pervasive, so adverse is too severe, and a disclaimer relates to evidence limitations. An Emphasis of Matter cannot be used instead of modifying the opinion under SA 705.
- AIssue a qualified opinion with 'except for' wording and describe the misstatement in a Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraphCorrect
- BIssue an adverse opinion because management refused to correct the misstatement
- CIssue a disclaimer of opinion because of inability to obtain evidence
- DIssue an unmodified opinion with an Emphasis of Matter paragraph on inventory
Explanation
Under SA 705 a qualified opinion is expressed when the auditor concludes that misstatements, individually or in aggregate, are material but not pervasive. The auditor uses 'except for' wording and gives a Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph describing the matter and its quantified effect where practicable. Adverse needs pervasiveness, disclaimer relates to inability to obtain evidence, and Emphasis of Matter cannot replace modification for a known uncorrected misstatement.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Completion and Review shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Completion and Review questions
- During the audit of Nilgiri Pharma Ltd, the auditor identifies uncorrected misstatements: an overstatement of inventory of Rs 4 lakh, and an…
- While performing final analytical procedures on Sagar Pharma Ltd, the auditor notices that the gross profit margin has jumped from 22% to 31…
- CA Nandini is auditing Vindhya Pharma Ltd. During the final review she identifies that the audit team did not obtain sufficient evidence on …
- Auditor CA Rohan signed the audit report of Gomti Engineering Ltd on 20 May 2026, and the financial statements were approved by the board th…
- In the audit of Meera Foods Ltd, the auditor lists uncorrected misstatements of Rs 2 lakh in aggregate, against a materiality of Rs 10 lakh …
- While completing the audit of Narmada Cements Ltd, the auditor evaluates uncorrected misstatements accumulated during the audit. Individuall…