CMA Final · Risk Management in Banking and Insurance · Operational Risk and Off-Balance Sheet Risk
Case: A bank has a forward contract with a customer to buy USD 1,00,000 at Rs 84 per USD. The current replacement cost (mark-to-market) is Rs 2,00,000 positive. The add-on factor for potential future exposure is 1.5% of notional, and notional is Rs 84,00,000. Under the current exposure method, the credit equivalent amount is:
The credit equivalent amount is Rs 3,26,000. Under the current exposure method it is the positive replacement cost of Rs 2,00,000 plus the add-on of 1.5% on notional of Rs 84,00,000, which is Rs 1,26,000. Using either component alone understates the exposure.
- ARs 1,26,000
- BRs 3,26,000Correct
- CRs 2,00,000
- DRs 2,84,000
Explanation
Potential future exposure = 1.5% x 84,00,000 = Rs 1,26,000. Credit equivalent = current replacement cost + add-on = 2,00,000 + 1,26,000 = Rs 3,26,000. Rs 1,26,000 omits the replacement cost, and Rs 2,00,000 omits the add-on.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Operational Risk and Off-Balance Sheet Risk shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Operational Risk and Off-Balance Sheet Risk questions
- Under the Basel framework, which of the following is a correct example of an operational risk event category?
- Which statement best describes why a bank's letter of credit and guarantee commitments are called off-balance sheet risk?
- A bank has a notional interest rate swap of Rs 200 crore with a corporate. Under the current exposure method, add-on is 1% of notional and t…
- Which statement best describes the Loss Distribution Approach to measuring operational risk capital?
- A bank issues a performance guarantee with a notional amount of Rs 200 crore. Under the RBI capital adequacy framework the credit conversion…
- A bank issues a guarantee of Rs 50 crore, a direct credit substitute carrying a credit conversion factor of 100%. The counterparty risk weig…