CA Final · Integrated Business Solutions (Multidisciplinary Case Study with Strategic Management) · Advanced Auditing, Assurance and Professional Ethics
Case: Meenakshi Textiles Ltd has a turnover of Rs 400 crore. Its auditor, CA Divya, plans materiality at 1% of turnover, i.e. Rs 4 crore, and performance materiality at 75% of that. During the audit, she finds an uncorrected misstatement of Rs 2.5 crore in trade receivables and a further misstatement of Rs 1 crore in revenue cut-off, both unrelated and not indicating fraud. Which statement best follows from the case facts?
Performance materiality is Rs 3 crore, being 75 per cent of Rs 4 crore. The aggregate uncorrected misstatements of Rs 3.5 crore exceed it, though not overall materiality. The auditor must evaluate them in aggregate and reassess the risk of further undetected misstatements and the adequacy of the audit plan.
- APerformance materiality is Rs 3 crore and the aggregate uncorrected misstatements of Rs 3.5 crore exceed it but not overall materiality, so she should reassess the risk of further undetected misstatementsCorrect
- BPerformance materiality is Rs 3 crore and the misstatements need no evaluation because each is individually below Rs 4 crore
- CPerformance materiality is Rs 3.5 crore and the audit is complete
- DPerformance materiality is Rs 1 crore because it is set at the lowest misstatement found
Explanation
Performance materiality = 75% x Rs 4 crore = Rs 3 crore. Aggregate uncorrected misstatements are Rs 2.5 crore + Rs 1 crore = Rs 3.5 crore, which exceeds Rs 3 crore but is below Rs 4 crore. Misstatements must be evaluated in aggregate, and the auditor should reconsider whether the risk of undetected misstatements still allows the audit plan to stand.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Advanced Auditing, Assurance and Professional Ethics shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Advanced Auditing, Assurance and Professional Ethics questions
- Case: CA Rohit, the statutory auditor of Deccan Pharma Ltd, discovers that the company's CFO has been inflating revenue through bill-and-hol…
- Case: Deccan Steels Ltd reported revenue of Rs 400 crore and profit before tax of Rs 20 crore. Its auditor sets overall materiality at 5% of…
- Case: Pragati Finance Ltd, an NBFC, is being audited. The auditor notes that the CFO also acts as the compliance officer, and a whistle-blow…
- Case: Sagar Pharma Ltd, a listed company, plans to appoint CA Nair's firm as statutory auditor. The firm has been providing internal audit o…
- Case: Kaveri Agro Foods Ltd, a listed company, is audited by CA Rohan. During the audit, Rohan finds that the company's finance head has ask…
- Case: Kaveri Textiles Ltd, a listed company, has an internal auditor who also prepares its monthly bank reconciliations and supervises the a…