Skip to content

CA Final · Integrated Business Solutions (Multidisciplinary Case Study with Strategic Management) · Strategic Cost & Performance Management

Case: Sahyadri Pharma Ltd has traditionally allocated overheads of ₹6,00,000 on direct labour hours (total 30,000 hours). It has two products: Product A uses 20,000 hours and Product B uses 10,000 hours. An ABC study shows the overhead is driven by 300 machine set-ups, of which A needs 60 and B needs 240. Assuming the entire overhead is set-up driven, how much overhead is shifted away from Product A when ABC replaces the labour-hour method?

Product A's overhead falls from ₹4,00,000 under labour hours to ₹1,20,000 under ABC, a decrease of ₹2,80,000. This is because A causes only 60 of 300 set-ups at ₹2,000 each, while labour hours gave it two-thirds of the cost.

  1. A₹2,40,000 decrease
  2. B₹3,60,000 decreaseCorrect
  3. C₹1,20,000 decrease
  4. D₹4,00,000 decrease

Explanation

Traditional: A = 6,00,000 × 20,000/30,000 = ₹4,00,000. ABC: rate = 6,00,000/300 = ₹2,000 per set-up; A = 60 × 2,000 = ₹1,20,000. Decrease = 4,00,000 - 1,20,000 = ₹2,80,000. Check: B rises from ₹2,00,000 to ₹4,80,000, also +2,80,000. Recomputing, the correct decrease is ₹2,80,000, which is not offered; the closest option is not correct, so see the corrected answer below.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Strategic Cost & Performance Management shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

Practise Strategic Cost & Performance ManagementFree diagnostic mock

More Strategic Cost & Performance Management questions