CA Final · Integrated Business Solutions (Multidisciplinary Case Study with Strategic Management) · Corporate and Economic Laws
Case: Sapphire Exports Pvt Ltd (India) exported goods worth USD 200,000 on 1 April. The invoice is payable within the period permitted under FEMA export regulations. The buyer has not paid by the due date, and Sapphire also wants to set off the export receivable against an import payable to the same overseas party. Which statement best follows FEMA export regulations?
Export proceeds must be realised and repatriated to India within the period prescribed under FEMA and RBI directions, and set-off against import payables is permitted only under specified conditions with proper reporting. Proceeds cannot be left abroad indefinitely, and a letter of credit does not remove the obligation to realise.
- AExport proceeds must be realised and repatriated within the prescribed period from date of export, and any set-off of exports against imports is allowed only as per the permitted conditions and reporting under RBI directionsCorrect
- BExport proceeds can be held abroad indefinitely if the buyer is a long-term client
- CSet-off of export receivables against import payables is freely allowed with no conditions or reporting
- DThe exporter need not realise proceeds if goods were exported under a letter of credit
Explanation
Exporters must realise and repatriate full export value within the period prescribed by RBI (currently nine months from date of export, unless extended). Set-off of export receivables against import payables is permitted only under specific conditions and with reporting. Holding proceeds indefinitely or ignoring realisation is not allowed, even with a letter of credit.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Corporate and Economic Laws shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Corporate and Economic Laws questions
- Case: Vihaan Pharma Ltd imports raw materials priced in US dollars. Its CFO says a rise in the repo rate and a depreciating rupee will both …
- Case: Bharat Pharma Ltd, a company in Hyderabad, receives a foreign remittance from a US investor for Rs 40 crore in exchange for equity sha…
- Case: Orion Steels Ltd, a company with a Rs 500 crore turnover, also has a related Competition Commission inquiry. Orion holds a 70% market …
- Case: Rohini Pharma Ltd, an Indian company, has a foreign promoter, Helix GmbH, holding 60%. Rohini plans to acquire 30% of a Singapore phar…
- Case: Sundaram Pharma Ltd, a listed company, proposes to buy back its own equity shares out of free reserves. Its paid-up capital is Rs 40 c…
- Case: Kaveri Agro Foods Ltd, an unlisted public company, has paid-up capital of Rs 40 crore. Its Board wants to issue shares to a few identi…