Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Beyond Exceedance-Based Backtesting of Value-at-Risk Models

Compared with a simple exceedance-based backtest at 99% confidence, what is the main advantage of the Berkowitz test for a validator?

The Berkowitz test's main advantage is that it uses information from the entire forecast distribution for every observation, not just rare exceedances. This gives it more statistical power than exceedance counting when data are limited, though it still needs the model's forecast distribution to compute the transforms.

  1. AIt uses the whole forecast distribution and so can use information from all observations, increasing power with limited dataCorrect
  2. BIt requires no assumption about the forecast distribution and no transformation of the data
  3. CIt guarantees that the VaR model will never be rejected when it is correct
  4. DIt measures only the size of losses beyond VaR and ignores their frequency

Explanation

Berkowitz uses every observation's position in the predicted distribution, not just whether VaR was breached, giving greater power from limited samples. It still needs the forecast distribution and transformation, and like any test it has a Type I error rate.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Beyond Exceedance-Based Backtesting of Value-at-Risk Models shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

Practise Beyond Exceedance-Based Backtesting of Value-at-Risk ModelsFree diagnostic mock

More Beyond Exceedance-Based Backtesting of Value-at-Risk Models questions