CA Final · Indirect Tax Laws · Inspection, Search, Seizure and Arrest
During a search at Anand Electronics, the officer seizes account books and registers on 5 May. Notice under the Act is issued on 20 May, relying on only the sales register and not on the purchase ledgers and other seized documents. Which statement is correct about the documents not relied upon?
Documents and books not relied upon for the notice must be returned within thirty days of the issue of the notice. With notice issued on 20 May, the deadline is 19 June. The period runs from the notice, not from the seizure.
- AThey must be returned within thirty days of the issue of notice, that is by 19 JuneCorrect
- BThey may be retained until the proceedings finally end, whatever the notice relied upon
- CThey must be returned within thirty days of the seizure, that is by 4 June
- DThey must be returned within six months of the notice
Explanation
Section 67(3) says documents, books or things not relied upon for the notice must be returned within a period not exceeding thirty days of the issue of the notice. Notice was issued on 20 May, so the thirty days end on 19 June. Counting from seizure, as in the 4 June option, uses the wrong starting point. Retention until proceedings end applies only to the documents that are relied upon and necessary.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Inspection, Search, Seizure and Arrest shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Inspection, Search, Seizure and Arrest questions
- Officers seized a consignment at the premises of Gupta Foods under section 67(2). The proper officer finds it practicable to leave the goods…
- Seized under section 67(2), documents and books of Anand Pharma were examined by the department. Notice under the Act was issued on 5 June r…
- During a search of Bright Textiles Pvt Ltd, Pune, authorised officers seized ledgers and a laptop under section 67(2). The directors were de…
- Officers searching the premises of Rao Steel in Hyderabad seized 40 tonnes of steel coils that are liable to confiscation. The coils were pr…
- Officer Rao, authorised under section 67(2), visits the premises of Ganga Textiles in Surat. The proprietor refuses entry, and the almirah h…
- Officers seized 500 cartons of stock from Rao Traders' premises under section 67(2) on 10 March. No notice about the seized goods has been i…