CS Professional · Goods and Services Tax (GST) and Corporate Tax Planning · Inspection, Search, Seizure, Offences and Penalties
Goods were seized from Verma Logistics under section 67(2) of the CGST Act on 1 April. No notice has been issued, and no extension has been granted. By when must the goods be returned?
The goods must be returned if no notice is given within six months of seizure. Section 67(7) requires return to the person from whom they were seized, and the period can be extended by a further period up to six months only on sufficient cause shown.
- AWithin thirty days of seizure
- BWithin three months of seizure
- CIf no notice is given within six months of seizure, the goods must be returnedCorrect
- DOnly after one year from seizure
Explanation
Section 67(7) states that where goods are seized and no notice is given within six months of seizure, the goods shall be returned to the person from whose possession they were seized. An extension of up to a further six months is possible only on sufficient cause shown, and none was granted here.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Inspection, Search, Seizure, Offences and Penalties shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Inspection, Search, Seizure, Offences and Penalties questions
- Under the CGST Act, 2017, which officer must authorise an officer to have access to a registered person's place of business to inspect books…
- The Government has notified certain goods as perishable under section 67(8). A proper officer seizes such goods from a cold storage owned by…
- Seized goods under section 67 of the CGST Act, 2017 may be released on a provisional basis in which of the following ways?
- A search officer seizes the account books of Kaveri Traders on 10 July under Section 67(2). Books not relied upon for a notice issued on 20 …
- Goods are seized under section 67(2) of the CGST Act from Mehta Traders, Surat, on 1 March. No notice has been issued, and the proper office…
- Officers searching the premises of Mehta Metals, Mumbai, under Section 67(2) are denied access to a locked steel almirah believed to hold co…