CS Professional · Goods and Services Tax (GST) and Corporate Tax Planning · Inspection, Search, Seizure, Offences and Penalties
The Government has notified certain goods as perishable under section 67(8). A proper officer seizes such goods from a cold storage owned by Kisan Fresh Pvt Ltd. Which statement is correct?
For goods notified as perishable or similar, the officer disposes of them as soon as may be after seizure in the prescribed manner and must prepare an inventory of the goods in the prescribed manner. There is no need to wait six months or for a Tribunal order.
- AThe officer must prepare an inventory of the goods in the prescribed manner and the goods are disposed of as soon as may be after seizure in the prescribed mannerCorrect
- BThe goods must be kept until the six-month period for issuing notice expires, and only then be disposed of
- CThe goods can be disposed of only after the Tribunal passes an order
- DNo inventory is needed since the goods are being disposed of
Explanation
Under section 67(8), notified goods (perishable, hazardous, depreciating or storage-constraining) are disposed of as soon as may be after seizure. Section 67(9) requires the officer to prepare an inventory of such goods in the prescribed manner. Waiting for six months or a Tribunal order is not required, and the inventory is mandatory.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Inspection, Search, Seizure, Offences and Penalties shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Inspection, Search, Seizure, Offences and Penalties questions
- Seized goods under section 67 of the CGST Act, 2017 may be released on a provisional basis in which of the following ways?
- A search officer seizes the account books of Kaveri Traders on 10 July under Section 67(2). Books not relied upon for a notice issued on 20 …
- Goods are seized under section 67(2) of the CGST Act from Mehta Traders, Surat, on 1 March. No notice has been issued, and the proper office…
- Officers searching the premises of Mehta Metals, Mumbai, under Section 67(2) are denied access to a locked steel almirah believed to hold co…
- Goods valued at ₹8,00,000 are seized under section 67(2) from Kaveri Steels, Coimbatore, and the firm wants them released provisionally pend…
- During a search under Section 67(2) of the CGST Act, authorised officers find the premises locked and the owner absent. Which statement is c…