CS Professional · Goods and Services Tax (GST) and Corporate Tax Planning · Inspection, Search, Seizure, Offences and Penalties
Officers of Sharma Traders Pvt Ltd, Jaipur, refuse access to a locked almirah during a lawful search under section 67(2) of the CGST Act. What may the authorised officer do?
The authorised officer may break open the almirah. Section 67(4) gives the officer acting under the search power authority to seal or break open premises, almirahs, electronic devices, boxes or receptacles suspected of concealing goods or documents when access is denied.
- AOnly record the refusal and wait for a court order
- BBreak open the almirah, because access is deniedCorrect
- CBreak open it only after thirty days' notice
- DSeal the premises but never open any receptacle
Explanation
Section 67(4) empowers the officer authorised under sub-section (2) to seal or break open the door of premises or break open any almirah, electronic devices, box or receptacle where goods, accounts or documents are suspected to be concealed and access is denied. No waiting period or court order is required.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Inspection, Search, Seizure, Offences and Penalties shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Inspection, Search, Seizure, Offences and Penalties questions
- Officers seized goods from the godown of Shree Ganesh Traders, Surat, under Section 67(2) on 10 March. No notice in respect of the goods has…
- Goods are seized under section 67(2) of the CGST Act from Mehta Traders, Surat, on 1 March. No notice has been issued, and the proper office…
- During a search under Section 67(2) of the CGST Act, authorised officers find the premises locked and the owner absent. Which statement is c…
- Consider these statements on Section 67 of the CGST Act. (I) Documents seized or produced which are not relied upon for the notice must be r…
- Seized goods of Kaveri Traders were seized under Section 67(2) of the CGST Act and no notice has been given in respect of them. Assuming no …
- A Joint Commissioner has reason to believe that a transporter is keeping goods that have escaped payment of tax. Which course is correct und…