ACCA Applied Knowledge · Management Accounting · Absorption and marginal costing
Harlow Ltd budgets production overheads of $240,000 and 30,000 direct labour hours for the period. Actual overheads were $252,000 and actual direct labour hours were 31,500. Using a direct labour hour absorption rate, what is the overhead absorbed for the period?
Overhead absorbed is $252,000. The predetermined rate is budgeted overheads of $240,000 divided by budgeted 30,000 hours, giving $8 per hour, which is then applied to the 31,500 actual hours worked.
- A$240,000
- B$252,000Correct
- C$256,000
- D$263,000
Explanation
Budgeted rate = $240,000 / 30,000 = $8 per direct labour hour. Absorbed = 31,500 x $8 = $252,000. Using budgeted overheads ($240,000) ignores actual hours, while $256,000 or $263,000 come from wrong rate or hours combinations.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Absorption and marginal costing shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Absorption and marginal costing questions
- Which of the following is a limitation of marginal costing?
- Which of the following is an advantage of absorption costing?
- Which of the following is the most likely reason for under-absorbed fixed production overhead in a period?
- Pellam Co budgets to produce 20,000 units with fixed production overhead of $100,000, absorbing on units produced. In the period it produced…
- Orrin Ltd's absorption costing profit for a month was $48,500 and its marginal costing profit was $45,000. Fixed production overhead is abso…
- Orla Ltd budgets to produce 20,000 units with fixed production overhead of $100,000, absorbed per unit produced. Actual production was 18,00…