CA Intermediate · Advanced Accounting · AS 1 Disclosure of Accounting Policies
Himalaya Engineering Ltd. changed its policy of valuing a class of spares from cost to net realisable value basis from 1 April 2025. The effect on the year's profit cannot be ascertained, but the effect is expected to be material in future periods too. Closing stock of that class stands at ₹6,00,000 at cost. Which is the most appropriate AS 1 response?
The company must disclose the change in policy and state that the effect on the year's profit is not ascertainable. Because a material effect is expected in later periods, that too should be disclosed. Inability to measure the effect never removes the AS 1 disclosure obligation.
- AMake no disclosure because the effect cannot be measured
- BDisclose the change, and since the amount cannot be ascertained, indicate that fact; also disclose that the change may have a material effect in later periodsCorrect
- CRestate the previous year's balance sheet to ₹6,00,000 NRV
- DDisclose the change only in the auditor's report
Explanation
AS 1 requires disclosure of a policy change that has a material effect in the current period or is reasonable to expect to have a material effect in later periods. Where the amount is not ascertainable wholly or in part, the fact is indicated. Hence the unmeasurable effect does not remove the disclosure requirement, making option A wrong.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on AS 1 Disclosure of Accounting Policies shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More AS 1 Disclosure of Accounting Policies questions
- Rohan Foods Ltd. sold goods in March 2025 for Rs. 20,00,000, and the customer paid in April 2025. The company's accounting year ends on 31 M…
- Under AS 1, which statement about where accounting policies are disclosed is correct for Mehta Steels Ltd.?
- Gomti Pharma Ltd. adopted a new method of valuing its stock of finished goods. The ICAI-prescribed disclosure of accounting policies is in p…
- Meghna Traders Ltd. changed its method of inventory valuation from weighted average to FIFO this year. The change is material. Closing inven…
- Ganga Foods Ltd. had always valued inventory at weighted average cost. In 2025-26 it switched to FIFO, which is permitted under AS 2. The ch…
- Himalaya Foods Ltd. changed its policy for valuing inventory this year. The effect on the current year's profit is a decrease of ₹8,00,000 a…