CA Final · Indirect Tax Laws · Refunds
Himalaya Metals Ltd's refund claim arose from an appellate order that attained finality. It filed the consequential refund application on 1 April, and the refund was paid 100 days later. The sixty days expire on 31 May. Which statement correctly reflects the proviso to section 56?
Interest at a rate not exceeding nine per cent is payable from the day immediately after sixty days from receipt of the application expire, until the date of refund. The proviso applies to refunds arising from final orders, and the sixty-day window still applies.
- AInterest at a rate not exceeding six per cent is payable from the date of the appellate order
- BInterest at a rate not exceeding nine per cent is payable from the day immediately after expiry of sixty days from the date of receipt of the application till the date of refundCorrect
- CInterest at a rate not exceeding nine per cent is payable from 1 April
- DNo interest is payable because the claim arises from an order
Explanation
The proviso covers refund claims arising from an order of an adjudicating or appellate authority, Tribunal or court that has attained finality. If not refunded within sixty days of receipt of the application, interest at a rate not exceeding nine per cent is payable from the day immediately after the sixty days expire until the date of refund. Here that is from 1 June for the remaining 40 days. Option C wrongly starts from the application date.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Refunds shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Refunds questions
- Meghna Pharma Ltd applied for a GST refund. The proper officer issued a notice in FORM GST RFD-08 on 5 March, which the company received tha…
- Meera Pharma Ltd. filed a refund application. The proper officer issued a deficiency-type notice in FORM GST RFD-08 under rule 92(3), receiv…
- Kaveri Exports Pvt. Ltd. received a refund order for ₹10,00,000 after the 60-day period. Its claim arose from an order of an Appellate Autho…
- Anand Machinery Ltd. filed a refund application on 1 March. On 20 March the officer issued a deficiency-type notice in FORM GST RFD-08 under…
- Kaveri Exports Pvt Ltd received a refund order in its favour from the Appellate Authority. The order has attained finality. The company file…
- Tulsi Agro Ltd. applied for a refund on 1 March, received on that day (assume 60 days end on 30 April). The officer sanctioned the refund an…