Skip to content

CMA Final · Cost and Management Audit · Management Audit in Different Functions

In a management audit of the purchasing function, which of the following findings would the auditor most directly treat as evidence of weak procurement effectiveness?

Heavy reliance on a single supplier without comparing quotations or market prices is the clearest sign of weak procurement effectiveness, because it risks higher prices, supply dependence and favouritism. Budget-matched requisitions, vendor rating and matching receipts with orders are good controls.

  1. APurchase orders are issued only after approved requisitions are matched with budgets
  2. BVendor performance ratings are reviewed periodically and used in sourcing decisions
  3. CA large share of purchases is placed with a single supplier without any comparison of quotations or market pricesCorrect
  4. DGoods received notes are compared with purchase orders before payment

Explanation

Placing a large share of purchases with one supplier without competitive quotations or price benchmarking exposes the firm to higher cost, supply dependence and possible favouritism. The other options describe sound controls: budget-matched requisitions, vendor rating and three-way matching of orders, receipts and payments.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Management Audit in Different Functions shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Management Audit in Different Functions questions