FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Expectations, Risk Premium, Convexity and the Shape of the Term Structure
In a one-factor model with no risk premium, a risk manager compares the price of a zero-coupon bond computed using the expected future short rates with the price obtained in an arbitrage-free model with volatile rates. Which statement best describes the relationship, and why?
The arbitrage-free price is higher than the price using expected rates, because the bond price is convex in the rate. By Jensen's inequality the expected discount factor exceeds the discount factor at the expected rate, so volatility lowers the implied yield even with no risk premium.
- AThe arbitrage-free price is higher, because the convexity of the bond price in rates makes the expected discount factor exceed the discount factor at the expected rateCorrect
- BThe arbitrage-free price is lower, because volatility raises the expected rate and thereby the discount rate
- CThe two prices are equal, because with no risk premium expectations alone determine the price
- DThe arbitrage-free price is higher, because investors demand a premium for bearing volatility
Explanation
Bond price is a convex function of the rate (e^{-r}). By Jensen's inequality E[e^{-r}] > e^{-E[r]}. So the price under volatility is higher and the implied yield is lower than the expectations-only yield. The 'equal' option ignores convexity, and the premium option confuses convexity with a risk premium.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Expectations, Risk Premium, Convexity and the Shape of the Term Structure shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Expectations, Risk Premium, Convexity and the Shape of the Term Structure questions
- A risk analyst explains why the yield on a long-dated zero-coupon bond is lower than the average of expected future short rates when interes…
- A portfolio manager notes that the observed yield curve is humped: yields rise to a peak at about 5 years and then decline. Assuming expecte…
- A trader notes that the 1-year spot rate is 2.00% and the 1y1y forward rate is 3.00% (annually compounded). Historical analysis shows the on…
- A portfolio manager observes that the yield curve is downward sloping at very long maturities even though she believes expected short rates …
- In a one-factor model, the short rate has volatility of 1.00% per year, and a bond has a duration of 5 (the bond price falls by 5% for each …
- Spot rates (annually compounded) are 2.00% for one year, 3.00% for two years and 3.50% for three years. What is the implied one-year forward…