FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · The Vasicek and Gauss+ Models
In a Vasicek model with k = 0.25 and σ = 2.00% (annual), what is the standard deviation of the short rate at a horizon of 2 years, as seen from today? Use Var[r(T)] = σ²(1 − e^(−2kT))/(2k).
The standard deviation is 2.25%. Variance is σ²(1 − e^(−2kT))/(2k) = 0.0004 × 0.632/0.5 = 0.000506. Mean reversion keeps it below the no-reversion figure of 2.83%, which would be σ√T, and above the 2.00% one-year-instant volatility.
- A2.25%Correct
- B2.83%
- C2.00%
- D1.77%
Explanation
2kT = 0.25×2×2/2... computing directly: 2kT = 2×0.25×2 = 1. Variance = 0.0004 × (1 − e^−1)/0.5 = 0.0004 × 0.63212/0.5 = 0.0005057. The square root is 2.25%. The 2.83% option is σ√T with no mean reversion. The 1.77% option uses e^(−kT) instead of e^(−2kT).
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on The Vasicek and Gauss+ Models shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More The Vasicek and Gauss+ Models questions
- A desk calibrates a Gauss+ style model to the observed term structure. A risk manager notes that the model has several mean-reverting Gaussi…
- In the Vasicek model, a European call option on a zero-coupon bond is priced with a Black-type closed-form formula. Which input to that form…
- In a one-factor Vasicek model, an analyst fits k, θ and σ to match today's prices of a set of zero-coupon bonds exactly with a single consta…
- In a Vasicek model with k = 0.40, a risk manager holds a 5-year zero-coupon bond. Using the first-order sensitivity of price to the short ra…
- A two-factor Gaussian model has a fast factor (mean-reversion speed 1.50) and a slow factor (speed 0.10). A shock hits both factors equally …
- A risk manager compares two Vasicek calibrations with the same θ and σ, but k rises from 0.1 to 0.5. What is the most likely effect on the l…