Skip to content

FRM Part I · FRM Exam Part I · Enterprise Risk Management and Future Trends

In an ERM framework, a firm's board sets a statement describing the aggregate level and types of risk it is willing to accept in pursuit of its strategic objectives. A business unit head asks how this should be used day to day. Which use is most consistent with good ERM practice?

The risk appetite statement should be translated into risk limits and tolerances that cascade to business units and are tracked against actual exposures. This embeds the board's view of acceptable risk in daily decisions, rather than leaving it as a passive or regulatory-only document.

  1. ATreat it as a purely regulatory document that is reviewed only when a supervisor requests it
  2. BTranslate it into risk limits and tolerances that cascade to business units and are monitored against actual exposuresCorrect
  3. CSet it equal to the firm's historical maximum loss so that no limits are ever breached
  4. DUse it only to determine employee bonuses, independent of the firm's strategy

Explanation

Risk appetite should be operationalized through limits and tolerances that cascade down to business units and are monitored against actual risk-taking. Treating it as a regulatory formality, setting it at historical maximum loss, or linking it only to bonuses does not embed it in decision-making.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Enterprise Risk Management and Future Trends shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

Practise Enterprise Risk Management and Future TrendsFree diagnostic mock

More Enterprise Risk Management and Future Trends questions