CA Final · Advanced Auditing, Assurance and Professional Ethics · Materiality, Risk Assessment and Internal Control
In the audit of Bharat Steel Ltd, the auditor finds that the company's year-end review process failed to identify a lease-classification risk that the auditor would expect any reasonable risk assessment process to catch. A material error in an earlier year was also reported as a prior period item in this year's Statement of Profit and Loss. Management had not acted on a significant deficiency communicated last year. What is the most appropriate conclusion under SA 265?
All three matters are listed in SA 265 as indicators of significant deficiencies: failure to identify an expected risk, a material misstatement disclosed as a prior period item, and no remedial action on earlier communicated deficiencies. The auditor should therefore communicate them in writing to those charged with governance.
- AThese are only isolated errors and are not indicators of significant deficiencies
- BOnly the prior period item is an indicator; the other two matters are not
- CEach matter is an indicator of a significant deficiency, so the auditor should communicate in writing to those charged with governanceCorrect
- DThe auditor should communicate them only to management, as they relate to accounting, not governance
Explanation
SA 265 lists as indicators: an ineffective risk assessment process (failure to identify a risk the auditor would expect to be identified), disclosure of a material misstatement as a prior period item, and management's failure to remedy previously communicated significant deficiencies. All three are present, so they point to significant deficiencies to be communicated in writing to those charged with governance. Treating only one as an indicator ignores the other two.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Materiality, Risk Assessment and Internal Control shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Materiality, Risk Assessment and Internal Control questions
- In auditing Sagar Pharma Ltd, which processes high-volume sales invoices through an ERP, the auditor is considering how automated and manual…
- At Sundaram Engineering Pvt Ltd, the auditor is evaluating controls over a large, unusual one-off sale of a division. The existing automated…
- Banyan Foods Pvt Ltd processes thousands of sales invoices daily through an ERP that applies predefined pricing and discount rules. The audi…
- CA Rao audited Delta Realty Ltd last year and communicated to the board a significant deficiency in controls over related party approvals. T…
- Sagar Pharma Ltd processes lakhs of sales invoices a month through an ERP with predefined pricing rules. For an unusual, one-off sale of a p…
- While auditing Kaveri Textiles Ltd, the auditor notes that the company has no process at all for identifying and assessing business risks, a…