CA Final · Financial Reporting · Ind AS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets
Kaveri Engineering Ltd has a present obligation from a past event, and an outflow of economic benefits is probable. However, the company cannot make a sufficiently reliable estimate of the amount. Under Ind AS 37, what is the correct treatment?
It is treated as a contingent liability. Ind AS 37 says a present obligation that does not meet the recognition criteria, because a sufficiently reliable estimate of the amount cannot be made, is a contingent liability. A provision requires a reliable estimate, so no liability is recognised.
- ARecognise a provision at the lowest conceivable amount
- BTreat it as a contingent liability, since a present obligation failing the recognition criteria is a contingent liabilityCorrect
- CRecognise a provision and later reverse it if the estimate changes
- DIgnore it completely because no estimate is available
Explanation
Ind AS 37 states that contingent liabilities include present obligations that fail the recognition criteria because a sufficiently reliable estimate cannot be made. Recognition of a provision requires a reliable estimate. So the item is a contingent liability and not a provision. Ignoring it completely is wrong because it is not a remote item that escapes disclosure.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Ind AS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Ind AS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets questions
- Which of the following best captures why Ind AS 37 says that in a general sense all provisions are contingent, yet uses the term 'contingent…
- Sundaram Textiles Ltd. is sued by a customer for alleged defective fabric. At the reporting date, the company's lawyers say it is not yet cl…
- Sundaram Textiles Ltd is sued by a customer for alleged defective fabric. At the reporting date, its lawyers say it has yet to be confirmed …
- Ind AS 37 contains Appendix 1 comparing it with IAS 37. What does it say about the transitional provisions found in IAS 37?
- Which statement about the use of the word 'contingent' in Ind AS 37 is correct?
- Which of the following correctly states why Ind AS 37 does not contain transitional provisions of the kind found in IAS 37?