CS Professional · Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) - Principles and Practice · Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
Kaveri Foods Ltd's CSR obligation for the year was Rs 60 lakh, but it spent Rs 75 lakh on eligible activities. The Board asks about the excess Rs 15 lakh. Which statement is correct under section 135(5)?
Kaveri Foods may set off the excess Rs 15 lakh against its CSR requirement for succeeding financial years in the prescribed manner. The third proviso to section 135(5) allows this, so the excess neither lapses nor has to be transferred to a Fund.
- AThe excess must be transferred to a Schedule VII Fund
- BThe excess is taxed as a penalty
- CThe company may set off the excess against the requirement for succeeding financial years, in the prescribed mannerCorrect
- DThe excess lapses and cannot be used again
Explanation
The third proviso to section 135(5) permits a company that spends more than required to set off the excess against the spending requirement of succeeding financial years, as prescribed. It is neither lapsed nor transferred.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) questions
- Tulsi Foods Ltd. has an ongoing CSR project and Rs 80 lakh of the FY 2025-26 CSR amount remains unspent against it, subject to the prescribe…
- Kaveri Pharma Ltd plans its CSR spend for the year. Its factories are in Sanand (Gujarat), but the Board is considering a project in a dista…
- Meera Foods Ltd has a CSR obligation of rupees forty lakh for the year. Who discharges the functions of the CSR Committee, and what does the…
- Lakshya Infra Ltd is covered by section 135. Which action is within the statutory functions of its CSR Committee, rather than the Board alon…
- Orchid Steels Ltd's Board is computing the net profit used to determine CSR spending. Which statement about the computation is correct under…
- Kapoor Steels Ltd had a CSR obligation of Rs 2 crore for the year and spent only Rs 1.2 crore. The Rs 0.8 crore balance does not relate to a…