ACCA Strategic Professional · Advanced Financial Management · The use of financial derivatives to hedge against interest rate risk
Kestrel plc buys a 3v9 FRA on $8 million at a fixed rate of 4.00%. At settlement, the reference rate is 5.00%. Ignoring discounting, what is the amount of the FRA payment before settlement adjustment, and who pays?
The bank pays Kestrel $40,000. The market rate of 5% exceeds the agreed 4%, so the FRA buyer gains. The difference of 1% on $8 million for six months is $40,000, before any discounting to the settlement date.
- A$40,000 paid by the bank to KestrelCorrect
- B$40,000 paid by Kestrel to the bank
- C$80,000 paid by the bank to Kestrel
- D$80,000 paid by Kestrel to the bank
Explanation
Rate difference is 1.00%. Over 6 months: 8,000,000 x 1.00% x 6/12 = $40,000. The reference rate exceeds the fixed rate, so the buyer receives. $80,000 ignores the half-year fraction.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on The use of financial derivatives to hedge against interest rate risk shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More The use of financial derivatives to hedge against interest rate risk questions
- Which statement about forward rate agreements is correct?
- Which of the following is a recognised limitation of using an FRA to hedge interest rate risk, compared with an interest rate option such as…
- A company with floating-rate debt enters a pay-fixed interest rate swap. Which statement best describes the risk the company retains after t…
- Orlo Co buys a 6v12 FRA on €12 million at 3.00%. At the start of the FRA period the reference rate is 4.00%. The FRA settles at the start of…
- Company X will borrow $20 million in 4 months for 6 months. The 4v10 FRA quote is 4.20% - 4.00%. At settlement, the reference rate is 5.00%.…
- A company has a floating-rate loan and fears rates will rise, but wants to benefit if rates fall. Which hedge best meets this aim?