Skip to content

CS Executive · Jurisprudence, Interpretation and General Laws · Contract Law

Kiran guarantees Lakshmi Finance for a loan to Mohan, on the contract that the creditor shall not act on the guarantee until Naveen has joined as co-surety. Naveen never joins, and the creditor then sues Kiran on the guarantee. What is the position?

The guarantee is not valid. Under section 144, where a guarantee is given on the contract that the creditor will not act on it until another person joins as co-surety, it fails if that person does not join, so Kiran is not liable.

  1. AKiran is liable for the full amount, as the condition is only a formality
  2. BKiran is liable only for half the amount
  3. CThe guarantee is not valid, because the other person did not join as co-suretyCorrect
  4. DThe guarantee is valid but Kiran may demand Naveen's later consent

Explanation

Section 144 says that where a guarantee is given on the contract that the creditor shall not act upon it until another person has joined as co-surety, the guarantee is not valid if that other person does not join. The condition is part of the contract, so it is not a formality. Proportionate liability is not provided by the section.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Contract Law shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Contract Law questions