CA Intermediate · Advanced Accounting · AS 29 (Revised) Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets
Mahesh Pharma Ltd. is claiming Rs 25 lakh from an insurer for a fire damage to a godown, and the insurer has disputed the claim. At 31 March 2026, the company's lawyers say the claim is likely to succeed but a final decision is awaited. In May 2026, before the financial statements were approved, the court passed a final order in favour of Mahesh Pharma for Rs 25 lakh, and the insurer has paid the amount. How should this be treated in the financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2026?
Rs 25 lakh should be recognised as income and a receivable in the year ended 31 March 2026. The final court order before approval of the accounts makes realisation virtually certain and confirms a condition existing at the balance sheet date, so it is an adjusting event rather than a contingent asset.
- ADisclose as a contingent asset in the notes only
- BDo not recognise or disclose, as the receipt occurred after year end
- CRecognise the Rs 25 lakh as income and an asset, as realisation became virtually certain through an adjusting eventCorrect
- DRecognise Rs 12.5 lakh being 50% as the claim was only likely
Explanation
Contingent assets are not recognised, but when realisation of income becomes virtually certain, the related asset is no longer contingent and is recognised in the period of the change. The court order before approval of the financial statements gives evidence of conditions existing at the balance sheet date (the claim arose from the fire), so it is an adjusting event under AS 4. Hence Rs 25 lakh is recognised. Mere disclosure would apply only if inflow were probable but not virtually certain.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on AS 29 (Revised) Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More AS 29 (Revised) Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets questions
- Kaveri Engineering Ltd. sells 2,000 machines in a year with a warranty. Past experience: 80% will have no defects, 15% will have minor defec…
- Mehta Chemicals Ltd. has a contract that has become onerous. Unavoidable cost of meeting its obligations is Rs 18,50,000, while the economic…
- Kaveri Appliances Ltd. sells goods with a one-year warranty. Based on past experience, for the year ended 31 March 2026, sales were Rs 8,00,…
- Shree Textiles Ltd. sold goods in March 2026 under a warranty to repair defects arising within one year. Past experience shows that 90% of g…
- Kaveri Engineering Ltd. decided on 20 March to close one of its plants. The board approved a detailed formal plan on 25 March, and on 28 Mar…
- Sundaram Textiles Ltd. gave a guarantee in April 2025 for a bank loan taken by its associate. At the balance sheet date, the associate is se…