FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Portfolio Performance Evaluation
Manager A has an excess return of 6% over the risk-free rate with beta of 0.6 and total volatility of 12%. Manager B has an excess return of 8% with beta of 1.0 and total volatility of 20%. Which ranking is correct?
Manager A ranks higher on both. A's Sharpe ratio is 0.50 versus 0.40 for B, and A's Treynor ratio is 10% versus 8%. Dividing excess return by either total risk or beta favors A despite B's larger raw excess return.
- AA ranks higher than B on both the Sharpe ratio and the Treynor ratioCorrect
- BB ranks higher than A on both measures
- CA ranks higher on Sharpe, B ranks higher on Treynor
- DB ranks higher on Sharpe, A ranks higher on Treynor
Explanation
Sharpe: A = 6/12 = 0.50, B = 8/20 = 0.40. Treynor: A = 6/0.6 = 10%, B = 8/1.0 = 8%. A is higher on both, so the ranking does not conflict. Assuming B's higher raw excess return wins ignores risk adjustment.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Portfolio Performance Evaluation shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Portfolio Performance Evaluation questions
- Using the same data as a standard Brinson attribution, a benchmark has Equity 50% at 10% and Bonds 50% at 4% (total benchmark return 7%). Th…
- A manager reports an active return of 3% against the benchmark with tracking error of 4%. Which statement about the information ratio is cor…
- A portfolio has an active return of 2.4% versus its benchmark and a tracking error of 4.0%. The manager reports an information ratio, and th…
- Using returns-based style analysis, an analyst regresses a fund's monthly returns on three style indices with weights constrained to be non-…
- A fund returned 11.0% over the year. Its custom style benchmark is 60% Index A and 40% Index B. Index A returned 12.0% and Index B returned …
- A portfolio has a beta of 1.0 to its benchmark, an annual active return of 1.8%, and an ex-ante tracking error of 6%. A risk budget allows t…