CMA Intermediate · Management Accounting · Decision Theory
Meera Exports faces two options. Option X gives Rs 80,000 with probability 0.7 and Rs 20,000 with probability 0.3. Option Y gives a certain Rs 60,000. Under the EMV criterion, the firm should:
Choose X. Its EMV is 0.7 x 80,000 plus 0.3 x 20,000, which is Rs 62,000, higher than the certain Rs 60,000 from Y. EMV ignores risk attitude and simply selects the higher expected value.
- Achoose X because its EMV is Rs 62,000Correct
- Bchoose Y because its EMV is Rs 60,000 and X is Rs 50,000
- Cchoose X because its EMV is Rs 70,000
- Dbe indifferent since both exceed Rs 60,000
Explanation
EMV of X = 0.7 x 80,000 + 0.3 x 20,000 = 56,000 + 6,000 = Rs 62,000, which exceeds Y's Rs 60,000. Choose X. Rs 70,000 comes from averaging probabilities incorrectly.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Decision Theory shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Decision Theory questions
- Sundaram Foods can launch a new snack. If demand is high (probability 0.4) profit is Rs 50 lakh; if demand is low (probability 0.6) the prof…
- A Kolkata firm uses the Hurwicz criterion with a coefficient of optimism of 0.6. Payoffs (Rs. thousand) are: Option P: best 90, worst 10; Op…
- Under the Laplace (equal probability) criterion, which act is chosen from these payoffs (Rs lakh) across four states? P: 20, 30, 40, 50; Q: …
- Rohit Pharma may spend Rs 4 lakh on a pilot test. The test succeeds with probability 0.5. If it succeeds, full launch gives an expected net …
- Under the Hurwicz criterion with a coefficient of optimism of 0.6, the payoffs (Rs lakh) of two acts are: X has a maximum of 80 and a minimu…
- A firm has four strategies and three possible market states with no probabilities known. Payoffs (₹ lakh) for states S1, S2, S3: A = 40, 25,…