CS Professional · Insolvency and Bankruptcy - Law and Practice · Insolvency Resolution of Individuals and Partnership Firms
Mehta Traders, a partnership firm, owes ₹8 lakh to a supplier under a contract. Of this, the supplier holds security covering ₹5 lakh, and the balance is unsecured. The firm also owes ₹50,000 as a court-imposed fine. Counting only the amounts that qualify, what is the amount of qualifying debt (ignoring the recency condition, which is not triggered)?
The qualifying debt is ₹3,00,000. A court-imposed fine is an excluded debt and a debt to the extent it is secured is also excluded, so only the unsecured ₹3 lakh of the supplier's claim counts as qualifying debt.
- A₹8,50,000
- B₹3,00,000Correct
- C₹8,00,000
- D₹3,50,000
Explanation
Qualifying debt excludes excluded debt and a debt to the extent it is secured. A fine imposed by a court is an excluded debt, so ₹50,000 is out. The ₹5 lakh secured portion is out. Remaining qualifying debt is 8,00,000 - 5,00,000 = ₹3,00,000. Option D wrongly adds back the fine to the unsecured part.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Insolvency Resolution of Individuals and Partnership Firms shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Insolvency Resolution of Individuals and Partnership Firms questions
- Kavita's fresh start application was filed on 5 June 2026. She has gross annual income of Rs 58,000, assets of Rs 12,000 and qualifying debt…
- Which of the following statements about the scope of Part III of the Code, as it applies to individuals and partnership firms, is correct?
- Ramesh Iyer, a sole proprietor, lives and runs his trading business in Coimbatore. Creditors wish to begin insolvency proceedings against hi…
- The Debt Recovery Tribunal at Pune passes an order against Meera Kulkarni, an individual debtor, under the IBC on 1 March. She files her app…
- Kiran Pharma, a sole proprietor, was granted a moratorium under Part III for 180 days. During this period, a suit that Kiran Pharma wished t…
- Rahul Mehta, an individual debtor in Pune, has been adjudged bankrupt by a bankruptcy order passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal on 10 March…