CS Professional · Compliance Management, Audit and Due Diligence · Non-Compliances, Penalties and Adjudications
Meridian Textiles Ltd, a Pune company, defaulted on a provision for which the maximum fine is Rs 10 lakh and no imprisonment is prescribed. The company wants to compound the offence without going to the Tribunal. Before whom can the compounding proposal be decided, and where is the application first made?
The Regional Director or an officer authorised by the Central Government can compound it because the maximum fine is within Rs 25 lakh. The application goes first to the Registrar, who forwards it with his comments. The Registrar cannot compound the offence himself.
- AOnly the Tribunal; application made directly to the Tribunal
- BThe Regional Director or an authorised officer, as the maximum fine does not exceed Rs 25 lakh; application made to the RegistrarCorrect
- COnly the court trying the offence; application made to the Registrar
- DThe Registrar alone, who may compound any fine-only offence
Explanation
Under section 441, an offence with fine only may be compounded by the Tribunal, or by the Regional Director or authorised officer where the maximum fine does not exceed Rs 25 lakh. Every application is made to the Registrar, who forwards it with comments. The Registrar has no power to compound himself, so the last option is wrong.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Non-Compliances, Penalties and Adjudications shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Non-Compliances, Penalties and Adjudications questions
- A company secretary in practice certifies the annual return of Tara Textiles Limited, a small company, otherwise than as required by section…
- Meridian Infra Ltd's director committed an offence punishable with imprisonment and also with fine. The company has applied to the Tribunal …
- Under the Companies Act, 2013, the Central Government appoints adjudicating officers for adjudging penalties. Which statement correctly desc…
- An adjudicating officer ordered Orion Pharma Ltd and its company secretary (an officer in default) to rectify a default and pay penalty. Nei…
- A shareholder of Meera Pharma Ltd wishes to prosecute the company's officers for an offence under the Companies Act, 2013. Which statement c…
- Kaveri Foods OPC Private Limited filed its annual return 40 days late. Its sole director is the officer in default. Under section 92(5) the …