CA Final · Indirect Tax Laws · Import and Export Under GST
Meru Engineering exported goods and received a refund of Rs 4,00,000 of integrated tax paid. Of the sale proceeds, 25% were not realised in India within the FEMA period and its extensions, and the RBI has not written off the requirement. Which statement is correct under Rule 96B?
Meru must deposit Rs 1,00,000, being 25% of the refund, with applicable interest within thirty days of the expiry of the FEMA or extended period. Rule 96B covers only the extent of non-realisation, and recovery proceedings apply if it fails to deposit.
- AIt must deposit Rs 1,00,000 with applicable interest within thirty days of expiry of the period, failing which recovery followsCorrect
- BIt must deposit the entire Rs 4,00,000 with interest, as part realisation is ignored
- CIt need deposit nothing unless a notice is issued first under section 73
- DIt must deposit Rs 1,00,000 within fifteen days of the invoice date
Explanation
Rule 96B(1) requires deposit of the refund to the extent of non-realisation: 25% of Rs 4,00,000 = Rs 1,00,000, with applicable interest, within thirty days of expiry of the FEMA or extended period. Failing this, recovery follows as for an erroneous refund. The full-refund option ignores 'to the extent'; the proviso to write-off does not apply here.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Import and Export Under GST shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Import and Export Under GST questions
- Sundaram Textiles Ltd, Tirupur, supplies goods to a buyer in Dubai under a Letter of Undertaking without payment of integrated tax. The expo…
- Neelam Pharma Ltd received an IGST refund on export of goods. Sale proceeds of ₹50 lakh were not realised within the FEMA period. The refund…
- Meridian Engineering Ltd exported goods and received a refund of Rs 12,00,000 of integrated tax paid on the export. Sale proceeds of Rs 40,0…
- Kaveri Engineering Pvt Ltd issued an export invoice for goods on 10 January under an LUT, but the goods were not exported. The Commissioner …
- Under Rule 96B, Zenith Exports received a refund of unutilised ITC on export of goods. Proceeds were not realised within the FEMA period and…
- Konark Steel Ltd supplied goods to a unit in a Special Economic Zone as a zero-rated supply without payment of integrated tax. Which stateme…