NISM Certifications · NISM-Series-X-A: Investment Adviser (Level 1) · Portfolio Performance Measurement and Evaluation
Mr. Iyer invested Rs 1,00,000 in a fund. After one year the value was Rs 1,20,000, and he then added Rs 40,000 at that point. After a second year the value of his holding was Rs 1,76,000. What is the annualised time-weighted return over the two years?
Time-weighted return links the sub-period returns, ignoring cash flow timing. Year one gave 20% and year two gave 10%, so the two-year growth is 1.32 times. Annualised, this is the square root of 1.32 minus 1, roughly 14.9%.
- AApproximately 17.6%
- BApproximately 20.0%Correct
- CApproximately 22.0%
- DApproximately 14.6%
Explanation
Year 1 return = 20%. Value after addition = 1,20,000 + 40,000 = 1,60,000. Year 2 return = 1,76,000/1,60,000 - 1 = 10%. Linked return = 1.20 x 1.10 = 1.32, so annualised = sqrt(1.32) - 1, about 14.9%. This does not match any option exactly, so the key is not reliable.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Portfolio Performance Measurement and Evaluation shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Portfolio Performance Measurement and Evaluation questions
- A portfolio earned 20% in year 1 and lost 10% in year 2. What is its compound annual growth rate (CAGR) over the two years, closest to?
- An investor put Rs 1,00,000 in a fund. At the end of year 1 it was worth Rs 1,20,000, and she then added Rs 30,000 making Rs 1,50,000. At th…
- A portfolio earned 18% in a year with a beta of 1.2. The risk-free rate was 7% and the market return was 15%. What is Jensen's alpha for the…
- Mr. Iyer invested ₹1,00,000 in a mutual fund. It grew to ₹1,20,000 at the end of year 1 and fell to ₹1,08,000 at the end of year 2, with no …
- Mr. Iyer invested Rs 1,00,000 in a mutual fund. At the end of year 1 it was worth Rs 1,20,000. He then added Rs 30,000, and at the end of ye…
- A portfolio's Treynor ratio is computed by dividing the portfolio's excess return over the risk-free rate by which measure?