CMA Final · Corporate and Economic Laws · Laws and Regulations related to Anti-Money Laundering
Mr. Sharma, a Deputy Director at the Enforcement Directorate, provisionally attaches property of Ravi Traders Ltd. under Section 5 of the PMLA, 2002 by an order dated 1 March. Ignoring any High Court stay, which statement is correct?
Provisional attachment under Section 5 lasts for a period not exceeding 180 days from the date of the order, and the attaching officer must file a complaint before the Adjudicating Authority within 30 days of the attachment. It cannot continue indefinitely.
- AThe attachment can continue for up to 180 days from the date of the order, and a complaint must be filed before the Adjudicating Authority within 30 days of attachmentCorrect
- BThe attachment can continue for up to 90 days, and a complaint must be filed within 60 days
- CThe attachment is valid indefinitely until the court decides the scheduled offence, and no complaint is needed
- DThe attachment can continue for up to 180 days, and a complaint must be filed within 180 days
Explanation
Section 5(1) allows provisional attachment for a period not exceeding 180 days from the date of the order. Section 5(5) requires the officer to file a complaint stating the facts before the Adjudicating Authority within 30 days of attachment. The 90/60 and indefinite options misstate these periods, and 180 days for the complaint confuses the two periods.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Laws and Regulations related to Anti-Money Laundering shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Laws and Regulations related to Anti-Money Laundering questions
- Mr. Raghav is convicted of money-laundering under the PMLA, 2002, and the proceeds of crime do not relate to any offence under paragraph 2 o…
- A Deputy Director provisionally attaches property under section 5(1) of the PMLA, 2002. Within what period must the officer file a complaint…
- Mr. Dev received tainted funds in 2019 and has since continued to use them and show them as legitimate income. Under the Explanation to sect…
- Mr. Rao is charged with the offence of money-laundering under Section 3 of the PMLA. In the proceeding relating to proceeds of crime, what d…
- Anil is charged with the offence of money-laundering under Section 3 of the PMLA, 2002, and proceedings relate to proceeds of crime. Under t…
- In a proceeding relating to proceeds of crime under the PMLA, 2002, the court is dealing with two persons: A, who is charged with the offenc…