ACCA Strategic Professional · Strategic Business Reporting (International) · Provisions, contingencies and events after the reporting period
Orchard Co has a 30 September 20X5 year end. Before the financial statements were authorised, the finance director, who is paid a bonus linked to profit, suggested delaying recognition of a $1.2 million inventory write-down arising from a customer's cancellation on 20 October 20X5 of an order for bespoke goods, so that it falls into the following year. The goods were completed before 30 September and the buyer was already in financial difficulty then. Which response is most appropriate?
Orchard should adjust inventory to net realisable value in the year to 30 September 20X5. The cancellation confirms conditions that existed at year end, making it an adjusting event. Deferring it to protect a profit-linked bonus would compromise integrity and objectivity.
- AAgree, since the cancellation occurred after the reporting period and is non-adjusting
- BDisclose the cancellation only and leave inventory unchanged to avoid misleading the market
- CAdjust inventory to net realisable value in the year to 30 September 20X5; delaying it for bonus reasons would breach integrity and objectivityCorrect
- DDefer the write-down to the interim period as it is below overall materiality
Explanation
The goods existed and the buyer's difficulties pre-dated year end, so the cancellation provides evidence of net realisable value at the reporting date. IAS 2 and IAS 10 therefore require the write-down as an adjusting event. Delaying it to affect a profit-linked bonus would be a breach of the ethical principles of integrity and objectivity.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Provisions, contingencies and events after the reporting period shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Provisions, contingencies and events after the reporting period questions
- Kestrel Group has a 31 December 20X5 year end, with statements authorised on 28 March 20X6. Kestrel's subsidiary, Sparrow Ltd, ceased to be …
- Glenfield Co has a reporting date of 31 December 20X5 and its financial statements were authorised for issue on 15 March 20X6. On 20 Februar…
- Ordell Co sells goods with a warranty. Past experience suggests that of goods sold, 80% will have no defects, 15% will have minor defects co…
- Kestrel Ltd is defending a claim for damages brought by a customer. Kestrel's lawyers advise that it is possible, but less likely than not, …
- Marlow Group has a year end of 30 June 20X6 and the financial statements were authorised on 10 September 20X6. On 5 August 20X6 the board de…
- Nimbus plc's year end is 31 December. In its draft accounts, a contingent liability for a customer's claim is disclosed because outflow was …