CA Final · Direct Tax Laws & International Taxation · Fundamentals of BEPS
Orchid Holdings, a company set up in a treaty partner country a few weeks before a planned share sale, has no employees, no office and no business activity. It was inserted by an unrelated-country group solely to hold shares in an Indian company and claim a reduced capital gains tax rate under the India–partner treaty. The treaty includes the BEPS Action 6 principal purpose test (PPT). What is the correct treatment?
The benefit can be denied under the principal purpose test. If it is reasonable to conclude that obtaining the treaty benefit was one of the principal purposes of the arrangement, the benefit is refused unless granting it is in line with the treaty's object and purpose. A shell with no substance fails this.
- AThe treaty benefit is granted automatically because Orchid is a legal resident of the partner country
- BThe treaty benefit is denied if it is reasonable to conclude that obtaining it was one of the principal purposes of the arrangement, unless granting it accords with the object and purpose of the treatyCorrect
- CThe treaty benefit is denied only if the tax authority proves that obtaining the benefit was the sole purpose of the arrangement
- DThe treaty benefit is granted if Orchid pays any amount of tax in the partner country, however small
Explanation
Under the PPT, a treaty benefit is not granted if it is reasonable to conclude, having regard to all facts and circumstances, that obtaining the benefit was one of the principal purposes of the arrangement, unless granting it would be in accordance with the object and purpose of the treaty provisions. The sole-purpose test is wrong because the PPT only requires one of the principal purposes. Legal residence alone does not guarantee the benefit.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Fundamentals of BEPS shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Fundamentals of BEPS questions
- Under the nexus approach of BEPS Action 5 for preferential intellectual property regimes, a company incurred the following expenditure on de…
- A Cayman company with no employees and no office holds the shares of an Indian company. Shortly before a large dividend was declared, the Ca…
- Zenith Optics Inc., a foreign company, sells equipment in India through Indian company Arjun Sales Pvt Ltd. Arjun's staff negotiate all mate…
- Under the BEPS Action 7 recommendations on preventing artificial avoidance of permanent establishment status, which change was made to the d…
- Under the OECD/G20 BEPS Project, the set of 15 Action Plans includes some that are classed as 'minimum standards' which all participating me…
- A tax consultant is briefing the board of an Indian group on the OECD/G20 BEPS Action Plan of 15 actions. Which of the following is NOT one …