CMA Final · Indirect Tax Laws and Practice · GST Returns
Sharma Traders, a registered person, accepts the discrepancy mentioned in a scrutiny notice and pays the tax and interest arising from it. The proper officer finds the payment and explanation acceptable. Which sequence of forms correctly describes the process under the CGST Rules, 2017?
The officer issues ASMT-10 as the scrutiny notice, the registered person responds with payment and explanation in ASMT-11, and if the officer finds it acceptable he informs the person in ASMT-12. GSTR-3A relates to non-filers, not scrutiny.
- AASMT-10 notice, ASMT-12 reply by taxpayer, ASMT-11 acceptance by officer
- BASMT-10 notice, ASMT-11 reply by taxpayer, ASMT-12 intimation by officerCorrect
- CASMT-11 notice, ASMT-10 reply by taxpayer, ASMT-12 intimation by officer
- DGSTR-3A notice, ASMT-11 reply by taxpayer, ASMT-12 intimation by officer
Explanation
Under rule 99, the officer issues ASMT-10. The registered person accepts the discrepancy, pays and informs or explains in ASMT-11. If acceptable, the officer informs him in ASMT-12. The first option reverses the roles of ASMT-11 and ASMT-12.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on GST Returns shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More GST Returns questions
- During scrutiny of a return filed by Kaveri Textiles Pvt Ltd, the proper officer finds a discrepancy and issues a notice in FORM GST ASMT-10…
- Under rule 68 of the CGST Rules, 2017, in which form is a notice issued electronically to a registered person who fails to furnish a return …
- Meera Enterprises receives a FORM GST ASMT-10 notice, accepts the discrepancy, and pays the tax and interest arising from it. Under the CGST…
- Registration of Narmada Agro was cancelled, and the officer revoked the cancellation by an order dated 20 June in FORM GST REG-22. Returns w…
- Under the CGST Rules, 2017, a return of a registered person is selected for scrutiny and the proper officer finds a discrepancy. In which fo…
- Registration of Bhatt Enterprises was cancelled by the proper officer on his own motion for failure to furnish returns, and the order was se…