CA Final · Indirect Tax Laws · Levy of and Exemptions from Customs Duty
Sunrise Traders Pvt Ltd of Surat imported machinery. The proper officer determined short-levied customs duty of Rs 8,00,000 under section 28(8) of the Customs Act, 1962, by reason of wilful mis-statement of facts. Interest payable under section 28AA is Rs 1,00,000. The order was communicated on 1 March. The company pays the duty of Rs 8,00,000, the interest of Rs 1,00,000 and the reduced penalty, all on 15 March. What penalty is payable under section 114A?
The penalty is Rs 2,00,000. Section 114A fixes the penalty at the duty determined, but where duty, interest and the reduced penalty are paid within thirty days of the order's communication, it falls to 25% of the duty. Twenty-five per cent of Rs 8,00,000 is Rs 2,00,000.
- ARs 8,00,000, being 100% of the duty
- BRs 2,00,000, being 25% of the dutyCorrect
- CRs 2,25,000, being 25% of duty plus interest
- DRs 4,00,000, being 50% of the duty
Explanation
Section 114A imposes a penalty equal to the duty determined. If the duty, interest and the reduced penalty are all paid within thirty days of the communication of the order, the penalty is 25% of the duty. Here 25% of Rs 8,00,000 is Rs 2,00,000. The option of Rs 8,00,000 is wrong because it ignores the reduction available for payment within thirty days. The option of Rs 2,25,000 is wrong because it adds interest to the base, whereas the base is the duty or interest so determined and only the duty is determined here as short-levied.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Levy of and Exemptions from Customs Duty shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Levy of and Exemptions from Customs Duty questions
- The Central Board directed that officers of customs should classify a certain product under one uniform heading across all ports. A Board ci…
- Sunrise Traders Pvt Ltd of Surat imported machinery and, by reason of a wilful mis-statement of facts, paid less customs duty. The proper of…
- For years, importers of a chemical at Mundra paid no duty because of a generally prevalent practice, though the goods were actually dutiable…
- For years, importers of a chemical at Mundra paid no duty because of a generally prevalent practice, though the chemical was actually dutiab…
- Himalaya Foods Ltd was penalised under section 114A for collusion-based short levy on imported ingredients. The department also proposes to …
- The Central Government notifies under section 28A that, because of a generally prevalent practice, duty on a certain imported good will not …