CA Final · Indirect Tax Laws · Levy of and Exemptions from Customs Duty
The Central Board directed that officers of customs should classify a certain product under one uniform heading across all ports. A Board circular further stated that the Deputy Commissioner at Kolkata must assess the pending bill of entry of Mehta Industries Ltd as fully dutiable. Mehta also has an appeal pending before the Commissioner (Appeals). Under section 151A, which statement is correct?
Only the uniform classification instruction is valid. Section 151A lets the Board issue instructions for uniformity in classification and levy of duty, but its proviso bars instructions requiring an officer to make a particular assessment or dispose of a particular case in a particular manner.
- ABoth the uniform classification instruction and the direction on Mehta's bill of entry are valid
- BOnly the uniform classification instruction is valid; the Board cannot require a particular assessment or disposal of a particular caseCorrect
- CNeither is valid, as the Board cannot issue instructions on classification
- DOnly the direction on the bill of entry is valid, as it relates to levy of duty
Explanation
Section 151A allows the Board to issue orders and instructions for uniformity in classification or levy of duty. The proviso prohibits instructions requiring an officer to make a particular assessment or dispose of a particular case in a particular manner, or interfering with the discretion of the Commissioner (Appeals). So the general instruction is valid but the case-specific direction is not.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Levy of and Exemptions from Customs Duty shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Levy of and Exemptions from Customs Duty questions
- A Board circular under section 151A directs officers to classify a certain imported component under one tariff heading for uniformity. Aman,…
- For years, importers of a chemical at Mundra paid no duty because of a generally prevalent practice, though the goods were actually dutiable…
- Himalaya Gems Ltd had a penalty levied on it under section 114A for duty short-levied by wilful mis-statement. The department also proposes …
- For years, importers of a chemical at Mundra paid no duty because of a generally prevalent practice, though the chemical was actually dutiab…
- Veda Imports Pvt Ltd, Chennai, was held by an order under section 28(8) of the Customs Act, 1962 to have short-paid duty of Rs 8,00,000 by r…
- The Board wishes to issue a direction to customs officers about uniformity in classifying a product. Which of the following would the Board …