Skip to content

CA Intermediate · Auditing and Ethics · Audit Report

The auditor of Mehta Foods Ltd concludes that the company's inventory, which is highly material, has been misstated. The misstatement is material but not pervasive. Management refuses to adjust. Which opinion should the auditor express under SA 705 (Revised)?

The auditor should express a qualified opinion. Under SA 705 (Revised), a material misstatement that is not pervasive leads to a qualified opinion, while an adverse opinion applies only when the misstatement is both material and pervasive. Emphasis of Matter cannot replace modification.

  1. AQualified opinionCorrect
  2. BAdverse opinion
  3. CDisclaimer of opinion
  4. DUnmodified opinion with an Emphasis of Matter paragraph

Explanation

Under SA 705, when the auditor concludes that misstatements, individually or in aggregate, are material but not pervasive, a qualified opinion ('except for') is expressed. An adverse opinion is reserved for material and pervasive misstatements. Emphasis of Matter cannot substitute for a modified opinion.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Audit Report shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Audit Report questions