CA Final · Indirect Tax Laws · Offences and Penalties and Ethical Aspects under GST
The Commissioner allows Anand Pharma Ltd's compounding application by an order in FORM GST CPD-02 dated 1 March. Anand Pharma had paid the tax, interest and penalty before the application was allowed. The company does not pay the compounding amount until 10 May, and the order was received on 1 March. What is the position under Rule 162?
The order becomes vitiated and void. The compounding amount must be paid within thirty days of receiving the order, and failure to do so voids the order automatically. Payment on 10 May is beyond that period, so the immunity does not stand.
- AThe order is valid, and interest alone is payable on the delay
- BThe order is vitiated and void because the compounding amount was not paid within thirty days of receipt of the orderCorrect
- CThe order is valid as long as it is paid before the prosecution ends
- DThe order becomes void only if the Commissioner issues a fresh notice
Explanation
Rule 162(6) requires payment of the compounding amount within thirty days of receipt of the order and proof of payment to the Commissioner. Rule 162(7) says that on failure the order is vitiated and void. From 1 March, thirty days end on 31 March, so payment on 10 May is late and no fresh notice is needed.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Offences and Penalties and Ethical Aspects under GST shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Offences and Penalties and Ethical Aspects under GST questions
- Under Rule 162 of the CGST Rules, the Commissioner issues an order in FORM GST CPD-02 allowing Sundaram Exports' compounding application and…
- Raghav Enterprises' compounding application was allowed and immunity from prosecution was granted. Later, the Commissioner finds that during…
- Kavya Enterprises, Pune, received an order in FORM GST CPD-02 on 10 March allowing its compounding application and specifying the compoundin…
- The Commissioner granted immunity from prosecution to Vihaan Enterprises under Rule 162(3) after compounding. Later it emerges that Vihaan h…
- Mehta Textiles Ltd. was accused of an offence under clause (b) of section 132(1) of the CGST Act, 2017. The company has never been allowed t…
- Mehra Traders, Jaipur, is facing prosecution under GST law. It applies to the Commissioner in FORM GST CPD-01 for compounding of the offence…