CA Final · Indirect Tax Laws · Offences and Penalties and Ethical Aspects under GST
Under Rule 162 of the CGST Rules, the Commissioner issues an order in FORM GST CPD-02 allowing Sundaram Exports' compounding application and specifying the compounding amount, received on 5 March. Sundaram pays the amount on the 45th day after receipt of the order. What is the consequence?
The compounding order becomes vitiated and void. Rule 162 requires the compounding amount to be paid within thirty days of receiving the order, and failure to do so voids it. The ninety-day period applies to the Commissioner's decision, not to the applicant's payment.
- AThe order is valid, as payment can be made within 90 days
- BThe order is vitiated and void, as payment was required within 30 days of receipt of the orderCorrect
- CThe order stays valid but interest is charged for 15 days
- DThe order is valid if the applicant furnishes proof of payment
Explanation
Rule 162(6) requires payment within thirty days from receipt of the order. Under rule 162(7), failure to pay within that time makes the order vitiated and void. The 90 days in the rule is the Commissioner's time for deciding the application, not the payment period.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Offences and Penalties and Ethical Aspects under GST shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Offences and Penalties and Ethical Aspects under GST questions
- The Commissioner granted immunity from prosecution to Vihaan Enterprises under Rule 162(3) after compounding. Later it emerges that Vihaan h…
- Kapoor Enterprises received an order from the Commissioner under Rule 162(3) allowing its compounding application and stating the compoundin…
- Mehta Textiles Ltd. was accused of an offence under clause (b) of section 132(1) of the CGST Act, 2017. The company has never been allowed t…
- Mehra Traders, Jaipur, is facing prosecution under GST law. It applies to the Commissioner in FORM GST CPD-01 for compounding of the offence…
- Kaveri Metals Ltd. was allowed to compound an offence under clause (c) of section 132(1) last year. This year it is accused of another offen…
- Mehta Traders, Surat, has been accused of an offence under section 132(1)(a) of the CGST Act and has applied for compounding. It has never c…