CA Final · Indirect Tax Laws · Offences and Penalties and Ethical Aspects under GST
Kavya Enterprises, Pune, received an order in FORM GST CPD-02 on 10 March allowing its compounding application and specifying the compounding amount. It failed to pay the amount, and filed proof of payment only on the 50th day after receipt of the order. What is the consequence under the CGST Rules?
The order becomes vitiated and void. The applicant must pay the compounding amount within thirty days of receiving the order and furnish proof. Missing that deadline voids the order. The ninety-day period applies to the Commissioner's decision on the application, not to the applicant's payment.
- AThe order is vitiated and void because payment was not made within thirty days of receipt of the orderCorrect
- BThe order remains valid but interest is charged on the compounding amount
- CThe order remains valid because the Commissioner may extend time without limit
- DThe order is void only if payment is not made within ninety days
Explanation
Rule 162(6) requires payment within thirty days from receipt of the order and proof of payment to the Commissioner. Rule 162(7) says failure makes the order vitiated and void. The ninety-day period relates to the Commissioner deciding the application, not to payment.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Offences and Penalties and Ethical Aspects under GST shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Offences and Penalties and Ethical Aspects under GST questions
- Kapoor Ltd applied for compounding, and the Commissioner granted immunity after Kapoor paid the tax, interest, penalty and the compounding a…
- Gupta Steels Ltd received the Commissioner's order in FORM GST CPD-02 allowing compounding of its offence on 10 March. It had paid the tax, …
- Ananya Traders, a Pune-based registered supplier, applied to the Commissioner for compounding of an offence under GST. The Commissioner call…
- After the Commissioner granted immunity from prosecution to Gupta Metals under Rule 162(3), it came to light that Gupta Metals had concealed…
- Deepak Agro, Indore, was granted immunity from prosecution by an order under rule 162(3) after paying tax, interest and penalty and the comp…
- Sundaram Foods Ltd. was earlier allowed to compound an offence under clause (c) of section 132(1) of the CGST Act, 2017. It is now accused o…