CMA Final · Direct Tax Laws and International Taxation · Survey, Search and Seizure
The last authorisation for a search on Arvind Mehta was executed on 1 June. The authorised officer, after recording reasons that it is necessary in the interest of revenue, provisionally attaches his property by order dated 20 July, with the required prior approval. Under section 247 of the Income-tax Act, 2025, the attachment is made within the permitted period and remains valid till:
The attachment is valid till 31 January of the following year. The order is within sixty days of the last authorisation, and validity runs six months from the end of the month of the order, which is 31 July, not from the order date.
- A31 January of the following yearCorrect
- B20 January of the following year
- C30 September of the same year
- D31 July of the next year
Explanation
The order on 20 July falls within sixty days of 1 June (1 June plus 60 days is 31 July). Under section 247(8)(b) validity is six months from the end of the month in which the order is made. The month end is 31 July, and six months from it is 31 January. Counting from 20 July gives 20 January, which is the mistake in that option.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Survey, Search and Seizure shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Survey, Search and Seizure questions
- During a search under section 247 of the Income-tax Act, 2025, the keys of a steel almirah in the premises are not available. Which power do…
- Under section 247 of the Income-tax Act, 2025, an authorised officer serves an order on 12 March under clause (4)(b) restraining a company f…
- During a search at the premises of Mehta Traders, a bank account and a laptop cannot practicably be seized, and the authorised officer serve…
- In a search of a Jaipur trader under the Income-tax Act, 2025, the last authorisation for search was executed on 10 June. The authorised off…
- During a search under section 247 of the Income-tax Act, 2025, books of account are found in the possession of Mr. Rajan. Which presumption …
- An authorised officer, during a search, finds that a bank locker cannot practicably be seized, for reasons other than volume or weight. He s…