Skip to content

CS Professional · Insolvency and Bankruptcy - Law and Practice · Group Insolvency

Two group companies, Kaveri Foods Ltd and Kaveri Cold Chain Ltd, are in separate CIRPs with the same set of financial creditors holding claims in both. The creditors fear inconsistent decisions. Which is a practical need for group coordination in this case?

The practical need is to avoid duplicated effort and conflicting decisions where the same creditors and shared assets feature in several processes. Coordination improves efficiency, reduces cost and supports consistent outcomes, without removing professionals, waiving claim filing or extending the statutory timeline indefinitely.

  1. ATo avoid duplication of efforts and conflicting decisions on common creditors and shared assetsCorrect
  2. BTo remove the resolution professionals from office
  3. CTo waive the requirement of filing claims
  4. DTo extend the CIRP period indefinitely

Explanation

Common creditors and shared assets mean parallel processes can duplicate work and reach conflicting outcomes. Coordination reduces cost and inconsistency. It does not remove professionals, waive claims or extend timelines indefinitely.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Group Insolvency shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Group Insolvency questions